no-pictures: update

Signed-off-by: Maxime “pep” Buquet <pep@bouah.net>

content/posts/no-pictures.md

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ take pictures of me.
 And despite saying all that, people kept teasing me about it, while some would
 plainly ignore my requests and take pictures anyway.
 
-When somebody insists, or asks why -- not that I mind having this discussion
+When somebody insists or asks why -- not that I mind having this discussion
 when they're not pointing a camera to my face -- all I hear is society
 reminding me that not wanting to appear on pictures isn't "normal".
 
@@ -30,18 +30,8 @@ isn't that I am saying no, it's that nobody hears that I am saying no. What we
 really should be asking is why am I compelled to justify this behaviour for
 others to accept it, and not for others to respect me saying "no".
 
-**Consent**, to name it, is to ask for a freely given "yes", and not to assume.
+**Consent**, to name it, is to ask for a freely given "yes".
 
 *Note that I am specifically talking about photographs here, which is an
 issue I've had. I am sure non-able/white/cis/males have had many other
 consent-related issues, and I can only sympathize.*
-
-<!-- « J'ai le droit de dire non ? »
-Dans le cas où un premier « non » est évoqué et la personne en face pousse et
-nous met plein de pression sociale dans la figure.
-Parce qu'on peut donner des raisons et expliquer, mais la vraie problématique
-ne se pose pas sur pourquoi est-ce qu'on dit non. Mais sur le fait qu'il n'est
-pas écouté.
-Donc ça pourrait être intéressant non pas de justifier ce refus, et de donner
-une raison suffisante pour que l'autre l'accepte. Mais lui faire se rappeler
-que c'est notre droit de refuser et que son devoir c'est d'écouter. -->