Looking at [the spec](https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0004.html#protocol-field)
it seems valid not to have a `var` attribute set, at least for fields of type
`fixed` that is:
> If the element type is anything other than "fixed" (see below), it MUST
> possess a 'var' attribute that uniquely identifies the field in the context
> of the form (if it is "fixed", it MAY possess a 'var' attribute). The element
> MAY possess a 'label' attribute that defines a human-readable name for the field.
Nightly rust complains about `cfg(..)` tests against undeclared
features and other unknown cfgs. They need to be explicitly declared
now.
The nightly/stable features don't exist, so I removed them and
substitutes the currently correct number for the single test where they
were used.
The `xmpprs_doc_build` cfg flag is now declared as expectable.
xmpp-rs normally has the stance to get buggy implementations fixed
rather than dropping checks. In this particular case I think this is not
a good use of resources:
- The disco#info feature var conveys no actual information:
If an implementation replies properly to a disco#info query, it is
already implied that it supports the protocol.
- There are broken server implementations out there.
A lot of them (all recent (>= 0.10 && < 0.13 AFAICT) Prosody IM
instances). At this point in time, xmpp-rs is unable to query
disco#info from MUCs hosted on such prosody versions, except by
workarounds (such as the one removed in this diff).
- XEP-0030 now features a note which reads:
> Note: Some entities are known not to advertise the
> `http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info` feature within their
> responses, contrary to this specification. Entities receiving
> otherwise valid responses which do not include this feature SHOULD
> infer the support.
The case would be different if there were no (deployed) implementations
which had this bug or if the bug actually had an effect on clients.
Especially the latter is not the case though, as pointed out above.
Hence, I conclude that this check is overly pedantic and the resources
(time, emotional energy of dealing with bugs, punching patches through
to stable distributions, etc. etc.) spent on getting this fixed would
be better invested elsewhere.
In addition, the workaround is extremely ugly and, even in the xmpp-rs
implementation, has no test coverage. Without test coverage of such an
implementation, it is bound to break in funny ways when xmpp-rs changes
the strings of its error messages (which is something one might do even
outside a breaking release).
rxml 0.10.0 (and earlier) had a bug which caused it to reject valid XML
documents if an UTF-8 sequence straddled the token size boundary (8192
bytes by default) of a text event.
This is necessary because `into_inner()` as implemented on Jid
consumes the value. That means it cannot be called through Deref
(because that only takes a reference).
The SCRAM RFC describes extensions that can be used to add extra
data into the protocol.
This commit adds support for the client scram mechanism to insert extension
data into the client messages at the locations specified by the SCRAM RFC.
Kafka utilizes these extensions when authenticating delegation tokens
over scram. Since I am writing a kafka client I would like access to
these extensions so I can support delegation tokens.
I've only added them to Scram::new not Mechanism::from_credentials
since they do not apply to other mechanisms. For my purposes this is
fine since I only need to work with scram. However it would be
limiting for other use cases, so I'm quite happy to add the extension
fields into Credentials if that was desired. For now I've left it out
since the fields would be scram exclusive and everything else in
Credentials is currently generic.
XEP-0068 is rather explicit that `FORM_TYPE` fields which are not
`type='hidden'` MUST be ignored (in most cases, see comments inside
the code for exceptions). The previous implementation returned an error
instead (and aborted parsing with that), which is obviously not
"ignoring".
[RFC 2426][1] says:
> The binary data MUST be encoded using the "B" encoding format.
> Long lines of encoded binary data SHOULD BE folded to 75 characters
> using the folding method defined in [MIME-DIR].
That implies that whitespace may occur in binval data and we thus must
be able to parse this correctly.
[1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2426#section-2.4.1
Other additional checks are already gated by the absence of this
feature. As the MR to remove these checks altogether is still blocked,
this should serve as at least as an intermediate solution to anyone
affected by buggy remote implementations.
This does not matter much because users need to replace usages of these
anyway, but it's better to have it right here to not cause additional
confusion.
This moves InnerJid into Jid and reformulates BareJid and FullJid in
terms of Jid.
Doing this has the key advantage that FullJid and BareJid can deref to
and borrow as Jid. This, in turn, has the advantage that they can be
used much more flexibly in HashMaps. However, this is (as we say in
Germany) future music; this commit only does the internal reworking.
Oh and also, it saves 20% memory on Jid objects.
Fixes#122 more thoroughly, or rather the original intent behind it.
This provides a non-copying API, which is generally favourable. The
other accessors were removed, because the intent was to provide this
"most sensible" API via the "default" (i.e. shortest, most concisely
named) functions.
This introduces a str-like type for each of these, which will allow
returning a ref instead of the copied data from various methods in
{Full,Bare}Jid.
The use of a macro ensures that all types are declared consistently.
This allows constructs like:
```rust
let residual = match Iq::try_from(stanza) {
Ok(iq) => return handle_iq(..),
Err(Error::TypeMismatch(_, _, v)) => v,
Err(other) => return handle_parse_error(..),
};
let residual = match Message::try_from(stanza) {
..
};
let residual = ..
log::warn!("unhandled object: {:?}", residual);
```
The interesting part of this is that this could be used in a loop over a
Vec<Box<dyn FnMut(Element) -> ControlFlow<SomeResult, Element>>, i.e. in
a parsing loop for a generic XML/XMPP stream.
The advantage is that the stanza.is() check runs only once (in
check_self!) and doesn't need to be duplicated outside, and it reduces
the use of magic strings.
